COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 21, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals |
|
NOTICE |
|
|
This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62. |
|
Appeal No. |
Cir. Ct. No. 2012CF4292 |
|||
STATE OF WISCONSIN |
IN COURT OF APPEALS |
|||
|
DISTRICT I |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Andre Derrick Wingo, Defendant-Appellant. |
||||
|
|
|||
APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: david l. borowski, Judge. Affirmed.
Before Curley, P.J., Brennan, J., and Thomas Cane, Reserve Judge.
¶1 PER CURIAM. Andre Derrick Wingo, pro
se, appeals a judgment convicting him of failing to register as a sex
offender. He also appeals an order
denying his motion for postconviction relief.
He argues that: (1) the charge
against him should have been dismissed because the Department of Corrections
did not properly notify him of his obligation to register as a sex offender;
and
(2) he was unable to register as a sex offender because he was homeless. We affirm.
¶2 Wingo entered a no-contest plea to the charge of failing to
register as a sex offender. It is well
established that a plea of guilty or no contest, knowingly, intelligently and
voluntarily made, waives all non-jurisdictional defects and defenses, including
claimed violations of constitutional rights.
State v. Princess Cinema of Milwaukee, Inc., 96 Wis. 2d 646, 651,
292 N.W.2d 807 (1980). Because Wingo pled
no contest to the charge, and does not contend that his plea was not knowingly
and voluntarily made, he waived his right to raise these arguments on appeal.
By
the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed.
This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. (2011-12).