COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 17, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of Appeals |
|
NOTICE |
|
|
This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62. |
|
Appeal No. |
|
|||
STATE OF |
IN COURT OF APPEALS |
|||
|
DISTRICT I |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
State of Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David Allen Ziegler, Defendant-Appellant. |
||||
|
|
|||
APPEAL
from orders of the circuit court for
Before Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ.
¶1 PER CURIAM. David Allen Ziegler, pro se, appeals an order denying his
motion for postconviction relief under Wis.
Stat. § 974.06
(2009-10).[1] He also appeals an order denying his motion
for reconsideration. He argues that his
sentence should be modified. We conclude
Ziegler’s claim is barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185
¶2 “[A]ny claim that could have
been raised on direct appeal or in a previous Wis. Stat. § 974.06 …
postconviction motion is barred from being raised in a subsequent § 974.06
postconviction motion, absent a sufficient reason.” State v. Lo, 2003 WI 107, ¶2, 264
¶3 After his conviction in 1998 on drug charges, Ziegler filed a direct appeal. We affirmed the judgment of conviction. After his direct appeal, Ziegler filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, which the circuit court construed as a postconviction motion under Wis. Stat. § 974.06. The circuit court denied the motion. Ziegler appealed and we affirmed the denial. Ziegler then filed another § 974.06 motion in the circuit court, which was denied. This appeal is taken from that order.
¶4 Ziegler’s current claims are barred under Escalona-Naranjo
because he did not raise them in his prior postconviction motions and appeals
to this court, and he has not alleged a sufficient reason for failing to
previously raise these issues. As so
succinctly stated by our supreme court in Escalona-Naranjo, “[w]e need
finality in our litigation.”
By the Court.—Orders affirmed.
This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5.