SUPREME
COURT OF WISCONSIN
|
Case
No.: 97-1426-CR |
|
Complete
Title of
Case: |
|
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Daniel G. Scheidell Defendant-Appellant. |
|
ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Previously reported at: 227 Wis. 2d 285, 595 N.W.2d 661, (1999) |
|
Opinion
Filed: October 22, 1999 |
|
Source
of APPEAL |
|
JUSTICES: Not Participating: SYKES, J., did not participate |
|
|
NOTICE
This opinion is subject to further editing and
modification. The final version will
appear in the bound volume of the official reports.
STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT
FILED OCT 22, 1999 Marilyn L. Graves Clerk of Supreme
Court Madison, WI
State of Wisconsin,
Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner,
v.
Daniel G. Scheidell
Defendant-Appellant.
¶1 PER CURIAM. (on motion for reconsideration). Defendant-Appellant Daniel G. Scheidell moves for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Scheidell, 227 Wis. 2d 285, 595 N.W.2d 661 (1999), on grounds that this court declined to review an issue concerning the circuit court’s refusal to admit comparative handprint evidence offered by the defendant.
¶2 In the exercise of judicial discretion, we have carefully considered the circuit court’s ruling on the handprint evidence. We agree with the court of appeals that the circuit court “correctly exercised its discretion in refusing to admit Scheidell’s exhibit.” State v. Scheidell, 220 Wis. 2d 753, 774, 584 N.W.2d 897 (Ct. App. 1998).
¶3 The motion for reconsideration is denied without costs.
¶4 DIANE S. SYKES, J., did not participate.