Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14321 - 14330 of 64217 for records.
Search results 14321 - 14330 of 64217 for records.
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and after conducting an independent review of the Record, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95073 - 2013-04-02
considering the no-merit report and after conducting an independent review of the Record, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95073 - 2013-04-02
CA Blank Order
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101260 - 2013-08-27
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101260 - 2013-08-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the Record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020054 - 2025-10-08
of the Record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020054 - 2025-10-08
[PDF]
State v. Mark J. Modory
against him.” He contends that the language in § 343.23(2), STATS., provides that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9438 - 2017-09-19
against him.” He contends that the language in § 343.23(2), STATS., provides that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9438 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
conducting an independent review of the Record, we have identified an issue of arguable merit. Therefore, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105615 - 2013-12-10
conducting an independent review of the Record, we have identified an issue of arguable merit. Therefore, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105615 - 2013-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Clarence E. Pelton
Wis.2d 412, 426, 415 N.W.2d 535, 541 (Ct. App. 1987), we have carefully reviewed the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11795 - 2017-09-21
Wis.2d 412, 426, 415 N.W.2d 535, 541 (Ct. App. 1987), we have carefully reviewed the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11795 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185714 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185714 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=653154 - 2023-05-04
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=653154 - 2023-05-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218693 - 2018-09-04
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218693 - 2018-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we No. 2018AP242
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240376 - 2019-05-07
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we No. 2018AP242
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240376 - 2019-05-07