Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14871 - 14880 of 84002 for case search.
Search results 14871 - 14880 of 84002 for case search.
State v. Melvin R. Tucker
. In these consolidated cases, Melvin R. Tucker appeals from the judgments of conviction for: (1) armed robbery and false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7864 - 2005-03-31
. In these consolidated cases, Melvin R. Tucker appeals from the judgments of conviction for: (1) armed robbery and false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7864 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Melvin R. Tucker
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Sullivan and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In these consolidated cases, Melvin R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7865 - 2017-09-19
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Sullivan and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. In these consolidated cases, Melvin R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7865 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recovered. The Stricklands declined AMCO’s offer, and the case proceeded to trial. AMCO conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90300 - 2014-09-15
recovered. The Stricklands declined AMCO’s offer, and the case proceeded to trial. AMCO conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90300 - 2014-09-15
State v. Melvin R. Tucker
. In these consolidated cases, Melvin R. Tucker appeals from the judgments of conviction for: (1) armed robbery and false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7865 - 2005-03-31
. In these consolidated cases, Melvin R. Tucker appeals from the judgments of conviction for: (1) armed robbery and false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7865 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
case initiated by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (DOT) in order to re-route a frontage road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75830 - 2011-12-28
case initiated by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (DOT) in order to re-route a frontage road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75830 - 2011-12-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843040 - 2024-08-28
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843040 - 2024-08-28
[PDF]
WI App 13
2020 WI App 13 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2018AP2324
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253382 - 2020-04-27
2020 WI App 13 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2018AP2324
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253382 - 2020-04-27
[PDF]
State v. Mario D. Tye
because of the self-defense element to the case. The trial court denied his motion. ¶4 Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20594 - 2017-09-21
because of the self-defense element to the case. The trial court denied his motion. ¶4 Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20594 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843040 - 2024-08-28
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843040 - 2024-08-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. On appeal, he contends the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he “‘aided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484577 - 2022-02-16
in this case. On appeal, he contends the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he “‘aided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484577 - 2022-02-16