Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 18691 - 18700 of 80099 for 任何超越自己权限制定的————,都是不合法的,也是无效的。 A、 教育文献 B、 教育政策 C、 教育法律 D、 教育法规.

[PDF] WI APP 42
. Van Hollen, attorney general and Anthony D. Russomanno, assistant attorney general. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139846 - 2017-09-21

Brian Read v. Donald Read
to grant relief. (1) Grounds for relief. Subject to sub. (4)(b) and (c), a shareholder of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9632 - 2005-03-31

State v. David G. Huusko
Claire County: benjamin d. proctor, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4582 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Melissa Newkirk v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
with the requisite statutory requirements; (b) fosters judicial economy; (c) reduces the number of meritless cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14640 - 2017-09-21

State v. David Gallagher
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Brown County: john d. mckay, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4928 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: PATRICIA D. McMAHON, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4502 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2011-12). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117692 - 2017-09-21

State v. Thomas L. Gillen
(1)(d). The circuit court found that the South Dakota convictions were “sufficient to meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2005-03-31

City of Shullsburg v. Ronald L. Monahan
for Lafayette County: william d. johnston, Judge. Affirmed. DYKMAN, P.J.[1] Ronald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13387 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joshua J.B.
. § 938.34(4m) would be “the only other [dispositional] option” for Joshua. See § 938.34(4h)(b). The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3144 - 2005-03-31