Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27291 - 27300 of 50556 for our.
Search results 27291 - 27300 of 50556 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, there would be no arguable merit to an appellate challenge to the sentence. Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=438572 - 2021-10-12
, there would be no arguable merit to an appellate challenge to the sentence. Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=438572 - 2021-10-12
[PDF]
Mathew E. Levin v. Shawn M. Radtke
should be subject to our review. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2430 - 2017-09-19
should be subject to our review. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2430 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
for sentence modification due to a new factor. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144185 - 2015-07-14
for sentence modification due to a new factor. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144185 - 2015-07-14
David A. Schlemm v. Matthew Frank
descriptions of events not contained in the record. Our review is limited to the record brought up by the writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19277 - 2005-08-10
descriptions of events not contained in the record. Our review is limited to the record brought up by the writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19277 - 2005-08-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to an argument that the circuit court erred in denying the postconviction motion. Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247232 - 2019-09-19
to an argument that the circuit court erred in denying the postconviction motion. Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247232 - 2019-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Babette Davis
. From our review of the sentencing transcript, we conclude that the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
. From our review of the sentencing transcript, we conclude that the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9236 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no further. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal.4 Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246752 - 2019-09-18
no further. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal.4 Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246752 - 2019-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that it was unreasonable to impose the DNA surcharge at sentencing. Our review of the record discloses no other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132018 - 2017-09-21
that it was unreasonable to impose the DNA surcharge at sentencing. Our review of the record discloses no other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Coleman v. McCaughtry, 2006 WI 49, 290 Wis. 2d 352, 714 N.W.2d 900, our supreme court further explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36762 - 2014-09-15
. Coleman v. McCaughtry, 2006 WI 49, 290 Wis. 2d 352, 714 N.W.2d 900, our supreme court further explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36762 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, and this court will not discuss it further. Our independent review of the record does not disclose any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94809 - 2014-09-15
, and this court will not discuss it further. Our independent review of the record does not disclose any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94809 - 2014-09-15