Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27581 - 27590 of 50556 for our.
Search results 27581 - 27590 of 50556 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). In that case, our supreme court held that “[w]hile clerical error is not always excusable, a clerk’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704292 - 2023-09-20
). In that case, our supreme court held that “[w]hile clerical error is not always excusable, a clerk’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704292 - 2023-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
decision, and thus, we presume it approves of our interpretation. See Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104781 - 2013-11-25
decision, and thus, we presume it approves of our interpretation. See Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104781 - 2013-11-25
State v. Alfonso Taylor
, 284 N.W.2d 917 (1979). We will substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact only when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5437 - 2005-03-31
, 284 N.W.2d 917 (1979). We will substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact only when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5437 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antraun Jordan
a number of other challenges to the judgment and to the trial court's order that, in light of our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8870 - 2017-09-19
a number of other challenges to the judgment and to the trial court's order that, in light of our decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8870 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law subject to our independent review. Baldwin, No. 2020AP829-CR 7 330 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390386 - 2021-07-15
is a question of law subject to our independent review. Baldwin, No. 2020AP829-CR 7 330 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390386 - 2021-07-15
[PDF]
State v. Mellissa Jacobson
if our conception of common knowledge is incorrect, this just goes to show that perhaps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21486 - 2017-09-21
if our conception of common knowledge is incorrect, this just goes to show that perhaps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21486 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court. Based on our review of what was actually said at the plea hearing and at the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208125 - 2018-02-08
court. Based on our review of what was actually said at the plea hearing and at the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208125 - 2018-02-08
[PDF]
WI App 25
into a snowbank.” We disagree. ¶9 Our supreme court has fairly recently explained: Whether officers had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929199 - 2025-05-19
into a snowbank.” We disagree. ¶9 Our supreme court has fairly recently explained: Whether officers had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929199 - 2025-05-19
CA Blank Order
questions he believes that his lawyer should have asked. During our no-merit review, we act as an advocate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144669 - 2015-07-14
questions he believes that his lawyer should have asked. During our no-merit review, we act as an advocate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144669 - 2015-07-14
State v. Kevin S. Schatzke
consider “degree of restraint” in our custodial evaluation, we consider whether the suspect is handcuffed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4811 - 2005-03-31
consider “degree of restraint” in our custodial evaluation, we consider whether the suspect is handcuffed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4811 - 2005-03-31