Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28861 - 28870 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 21, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Co...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444379 - 2021-10-21

State v. James E. Brown
de novo. See State v. Brandt, 226 Wis. 2d 610, 618, 594 N.W.2d 759 (1999). Likewise, whether Brown
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25868 - 2006-07-11

[PDF] State v. Michael D. M.
to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2671 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 69
that we review de novo. State v. Stewart, 2018 WI App 41, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 546, 916 N.W.2d 188; State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015218 - 2025-12-17

Frontsheet
the defendant, presents a question of law that this court decides de novo. Id.; Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73102 - 2011-10-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional minimums is a question of law we review de novo. Id. To prove ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209744 - 2018-03-15

[PDF] State v. Darcy N. K.
, and, if so, whether that performance prejudiced the defense, are questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12092 - 2017-09-21

Badger Mutual Insurance Company v. Dennis Schmitz
apply de novo review. Hull v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 222 Wis. 2d 627, 636, 586 N.W.2d 863
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16427 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael L. Piaskowski
, is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 112, 490 N.W.2d at 756. We now turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12768 - 2005-03-31

Milwaukee Regional Medical Center v. City of Wauwatosa
, or, alternatively, under § 70.11(4). Our review is de novo. See Trustees of Ind. Univ. v. Town of Rhine, 170 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25596 - 2006-07-25