Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37951 - 37960 of 69168 for j o e y.
Search results 37951 - 37960 of 69168 for j o e y.
Frontsheet
PER CURIAM. We review a report filed by referee Robert E. Kinney recommending that the court suspend
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137808 - 2015-03-17
PER CURIAM. We review a report filed by referee Robert E. Kinney recommending that the court suspend
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137808 - 2015-03-17
Frontsheet
or mood-altering substances; (e) register with Affinity Online Solutions and submit to random alcohol/drug
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84684 - 2012-07-09
or mood-altering substances; (e) register with Affinity Online Solutions and submit to random alcohol/drug
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84684 - 2012-07-09
[PDF]
Racine Education Association v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and John D. Niemisto, assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12030 - 2017-09-21
, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and John D. Niemisto, assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12030 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66242 - 2014-09-15
and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66242 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jerome E.M. v. Gail M.
blood tests and adjudicating Jerome E. M.’s paternity petition, it would be in her son’s best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14553 - 2017-09-21
blood tests and adjudicating Jerome E. M.’s paternity petition, it would be in her son’s best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14553 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2019-20). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578854 - 2022-10-19
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2019-20). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578854 - 2022-10-19
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. John Husz
; and (e) Reached a point at which, in the judgment of the commission, discretionary parole would not pose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13421 - 2017-09-21
; and (e) Reached a point at which, in the judgment of the commission, discretionary parole would not pose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13421 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
7 ¶13 On appeal, “[w]e review a trial court’s conclusion that a sentence it imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233560 - 2019-01-29
7 ¶13 On appeal, “[w]e review a trial court’s conclusion that a sentence it imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233560 - 2019-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County: KEVIN E. MARTENS and jeffrey A. wagner, Judges.[1] Affirmed. Before Fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116147 - 2014-07-07
for Milwaukee County: KEVIN E. MARTENS and jeffrey A. wagner, Judges.[1] Affirmed. Before Fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116147 - 2014-07-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
FINE, J. Hurcel Staples appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28828 - 2014-09-15
FINE, J. Hurcel Staples appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28828 - 2014-09-15