Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9521 - 9530 of 43707 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Cari Pembuat Kitchen Set Minimalis Abu Abu Minimalis Jebres Surakarta.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
warranting relief. A new factor is “‘a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1093693 - 2026-03-25

COURT OF APPEALS
the existence of a new factor. Whether the fact or set of facts put forth by the defendant constitutes a “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72642 - 2011-10-24

[PDF] Otto Mogged III v. Margaret A. Mogged
determination pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1)(h) and setting maintenance at $2,000 per month. Otto argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3417 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
wrongfully destroying Finch’s vehicle. For the reasons set forth below, this court affirms. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858979 - 2024-10-08

[PDF] Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. Frank Crivello
the admitted allegations and the matters set forth in the stipulation in respect to mitigation. The parties
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17277 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Laura K. Waterhouse v. Thomas A. Waterhouse
sought modification of the original child support order. After an initial appearance, the court set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18094 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to commence circuit court review of the WEC’s decision. WISCONSIN STAT. § 801.02(5) sets forth three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815670 - 2024-06-25

William L. Genrich v. City of Rice Lake
to the circuit court on November 12, 2004. The court rendered a written decision on January 27, 2005, which set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25307 - 2006-05-30

State v. James G.L.
as restitution. (Emphasis added.) ¶4 The interpretation of a statute and its application to a set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6498 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
set aside the assessment and remand to the board for further proceedings.” Nankin, 245 Wis. 2d 86
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45178 - 2010-02-28