Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 101 - 110 of 13915 for probate.
Search results 101 - 110 of 13915 for probate.
State v. Tony J. Lalicata - 2012AP000225
was potentially eligible for a stayed sentence and probation under Wis. Stat. § 973.09(1)(a) (2009-10),[1] instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89436 - 2012-12-18
was potentially eligible for a stayed sentence and probation under Wis. Stat. § 973.09(1)(a) (2009-10),[1] instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89436 - 2012-12-18
[PDF]
State v. Tony J. Lalicata - 2012AP000225
was potentially No. 2012AP225-CR 2 eligible for a stayed sentence and probation under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89436 - 2014-09-15
was potentially No. 2012AP225-CR 2 eligible for a stayed sentence and probation under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89436 - 2014-09-15
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr. - 2000AP000491
counts of failure to pay child support following probation revocation proceedings. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2295 - 2005-03-31
counts of failure to pay child support following probation revocation proceedings. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2295 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr. - 2000AP000490
counts of failure to pay child support following probation revocation proceedings. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2294 - 2005-03-31
counts of failure to pay child support following probation revocation proceedings. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Ameen - 1998AP000893
his probation on revoked sentences because the trial court erred in failing to grant a stay of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13810 - 2014-09-15
his probation on revoked sentences because the trial court erred in failing to grant a stay of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13810 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Marquis D. Rosenburg - 1995AP001760
), which held that a probationer confined in a county jail as a condition of probation could
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17030 - 2017-09-21
), which held that a probationer confined in a county jail as a condition of probation could
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17030 - 2017-09-21
State v. Marquis D. Rosenburg - 1995AP001760
(1975), which held that a probationer confined in a county jail as a condition of probation could
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17030 - 2005-03-31
(1975), which held that a probationer confined in a county jail as a condition of probation could
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17030 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Raymond F. Gose - 2003AP002837
of probation. We conclude that having already litigated his entitlement to a new trial based on the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6989 - 2017-09-20
of probation. We conclude that having already litigated his entitlement to a new trial based on the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6989 - 2017-09-20
State v. Raymond F. Gose - 2003AP002837
and conditions of probation. We conclude that having already litigated his entitlement to a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6989 - 2005-03-31
and conditions of probation. We conclude that having already litigated his entitlement to a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6989 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lazaro Ozuna - 2015AP001877
, a probationer must "satisf[y] the conditions of probation." Wis. Stat. § 973.015(1m)(b) (2013-14). 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191998 - 2017-09-21
, a probationer must "satisf[y] the conditions of probation." Wis. Stat. § 973.015(1m)(b) (2013-14). 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191998 - 2017-09-21