No.
96-1176-FT
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT III
DAVID LANG and
THOMAS LANG,
Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v. ERRATA SHEET
DIANNE J. SEIBERT,
Defendant-Appellant.
|
Marilyn
L. Graves Clerk
of Court of Appeals P.O.
Box 1688 Madison,
WI 53702 |
Peg
Carlson Chief
Staff Attorney 119
Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison,
WI 53703 |
|
Court
of Appeals District I 633
W. Wisconsin Ave. Milwaukee,
WI 53203 |
Court
of Appeals District II 2727
N. Grandview Blvd. Waukesha,
WI 53188-1672 |
|
Trial
Court Clerk Sawyer
County Courthouse 406
Main Hayward,
Wi 54843 |
Court
of Appeals District IV 119
Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison,
WI 53703 |
|
Jennifer
Krapf Administrative
Assistant 119
Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison,
WI 53703 |
Hon.
Norman L. Yackel Circuit
Judge Sawyer
County Courthouse Hayward,
WI 54843 |
|
David
M. Weiby 1109
Tower Ave. Superior,
WI 54880 |
Robert
Kanuit Weiby,
Maki, Durst, Ledin 1109
Tower Ave. Superior,
WI 54880 |
Gregory
A. Jennings
1128
2nd St., Box 726
Chetek,
WI 54728
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that
the attached page one is to be substituted for page one in the above-captioned
opinion which was released on November 5, 1996.
Dated this 5th day of March, 2005.
|
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED NOVEMBER 5, 1996 |
NOTICE |
|
A
party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse
decision by the Court of Appeals. See §
808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. |
This
opinion is subject to further editing.
If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of
the Official Reports. |
No.
96-1176-FT
STATE
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF
APPEALS
DISTRICT III
DAVID
LANG
and
THOMAS LANG,
Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
DIANNE
J. SEIBERT,
Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment
of the circuit court for Sawyer County:
NORMAN L. YACKEL, Judge. Affirmed.
Before Cane, P.J.,
LaRocque and Myse, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Dianne Seibert appeals a summary judgment
for specific performance of an offer to purchase contract she entered into with
David and Thomas Lang.[1] Seibert argues that (1) disputed issues of
material fact preclude