COURT OF APPEALS

DECISION

DATED AND FILED

 

February 5, 2003

 

Cornelia G. Clark

Clerk of Court of Appeals

 

 

 

NOTICE

 

 

This opinion is subject to further editing.  If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. 

 

A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals.  See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62. 

 

 

 

 

Appeal No. 

02-1691

 

Cir. Ct. No.  01-TR-13416

STATE OF WISCONSIN   

IN COURT OF APPEALS

 

DISTRICT II

 

 

 

 

State of Wisconsin,

 

                        Plaintiff-Respondent,

 

              v.

 

William K. Brown,

 

                        Defendant-Appellant.

 

 

 

 

            APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County:  MICHAEL O. BOHREN, Judge.  Affirmed. 

            1        NETTESHEIM, P.J.[1]   William K. Brown appeals from an order revoking his driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical test pursuant to the implied consent law, Wis. Stat. § 343.305.  Brown contends that the statute unconstitutionally coerces consent by threatening the revocation of the suspect’s driving privileges.  We recently rejected this very argument in State v. Wintlend, 2002 WI App 314, No. 02-0965-CR.  We affirm on the basis of Wintlend.

                        By the Court.—Order affirmed.

                        This opinion will not be published.  See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4.

 

 

 


[1]  This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000).  All statutory references are to the 1999-2000 version.