District IV

 


February 20, 2013 


To:


Hon. Michael R. Fitzpatrick

Circuit Court Judge

51 S. Main Street

Janesville, WI 53545

 

Eldred Mielke

Clerk of Circuit Court

Rock Co. Courthouse

51 S. Main Street

Janesville, WI 53545

 

Marguerite M. Moeller

Assistant Attorney General

P.O. Box 7857

Madison, WI 53707-7857


Richard J. Sullivan

Asst. District Attorney

51 S. Main Street

Janesville, WI 53545

 

Brian J. Conaway 175906

Oshkosh Corr. Inst.

P.O. Box 3310

Oshkosh, WI 54903-3310


 

You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010AP3051

State of Wisconsin v. Brian J. Conaway (L.C. # 2007CF3115)

 

 

 


Before Lundsten, P.J., Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ.  

Brian Conaway appeals an order that denied his motion for postconviction relief from a judgment convicting him of being party to the crime of burglary of a building or dwelling.  After reviewing the briefs and record at conference, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition.  See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1]

The sole issue Conaway raises on appeal is whether law enforcement officers violated his constitutional rights by seizing his vehicle, moving it to a private lot, and installing a GPS tracking device on it.  See United States v. Jones, — U.S. —, 132 S. Ct. 945 (2012).  However, Conaway waived any right to judicial review of such a claim by entering a guilty plea without first preserving the issue in a suppression motion.  Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973) (“When a criminal defendant has solemnly admitted in open court that he is in fact guilty of the offense with which he is charged, he may not thereafter raise independent claims relating to the deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea”); cf. Wis. Stat. § 971.31(1) (allowing defendant who has entered plea to appeal an order denying a motion to suppress).

Because we conclude that the issue presented on appeal is procedurally barred, we need not address the State’s additional request that we strike materials in the appellant’s appendix as being outside of the record.

IT IS ORDERED that the order denying Conaway’s postconviction motion is summarily affirmed under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1).

 


Diane M. Fremgen

Clerk of Court of Appeals



[1]  All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted.