|
|
|
|
|
Case No.: |
03-2535-D |
|
|
Complete Title: |
|
|
|
|
In the
Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against
William D. Whitnall, Attorney at Law: Office
of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. William
D. Whitnall, Respondent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST WHITNALL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opinion Filed: |
November 17, 2003 |
|
|
Submitted on Briefs: |
||
|
Oral Argument: |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Source of Appeal: |
|
|
|
|
Court: |
|
|
|
County: |
|
|
|
Judge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Justices: |
|
|
|
|
Concurred: |
|
|
|
Dissented: |
|
|
|
Not Participating: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attorneys: |
|
|
2003 WI 146
|
|
Supreme
Court of Wisconsin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice This order is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. |
|
The Court entered the following order on this date:
Attorney William
D. Whitnall has filed a petition for consensual license revocation pursuant to
SCR 22.19(3). Whitnall was admitted to
practice law in 1968 but his license has been under suspension since November 22,
1999 and he has not been reinstated. Disciplinary
Proceedings Against Whitnall, 2000 WI 131, 239 Wis. 2d 721, 619 N.W.2d
926.
The Office of
Lawyer Regulation (OLR) is currently investigating Whitnall concerning
allegations of misconduct in his representation of two different clients. In those matters, the Preliminary Review
Committee has found cause to proceed against Whitnall with respect to six
professional misconduct rule violations including:
OLR File No.
99-081110 -- failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing
a client in violation of SCR 20:1.3; failing to inform a client of an offer of
settlement and to abide by his client’s decision whether to accept an offer of
settlement in violation of SCR 20:1.2(a); failing to surrender papers and
property to which his client was entitled in violation of SCR 20:1.16(d).
OLR File No.
01-091117 -- failing to file a lawsuit or settle a client’s claim within the
statute of limitations thereby failing to act with reasonable diligence and
promptness in representing a client in violation of SCR 20:1.3; failing to
respond to a client’s inquiries regarding the status of her lawsuit thereby
failing to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and
to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information in violation of SCR
20:1.4(a); and failing to inform his client of the applicable statute of
limitations so the client could make an informed decision about retaining other
counsel prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations period, thereby
failing to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the
client to make informed decisions regarding the representation in violation of
SCR 20:1.4(b).
In his petition,
Attorney Whitnall acknowledges that he cannot successfully defend against the
pending allegations.
OLR has responded
to Whitnall’s petition for consensual license revocation and recommends that
the petition be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED
Attorney William D. Whitnall’s petition for consensual license revocation is granted
and his license to practice law in this state is revoked as of the date of this
order.
IT IS FURTHER
ORDERED that to the extent that he has already not done so, William D.
Whitnall must comply with SCR 22.26 relating to activities following license revocation.