|
|
NOTICE This opinion is
subject to further editing and modification.
The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official
reports. |
|
|
|
No. 93-2873
STATE OF WISCONSIN
: IN SUPREME COURT
|
|
|
|
Russell M. Ware, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Adrian P. Schoone, Richard A. Fortune and Mark J. Leuck, Defendants-Respondents-Respondents, Schoone, Fortune & Leuck, S.C., Defendant. |
FILED MAR 29,
1996 Marilyn L. Graves Clerk of Supreme Court Madison, WI |
REVIEW
of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed.
PER CURIAM. The
court is equally divided on the question of whether the unpublished decision of
the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed, Chief Justice ROLAND B.
DAY, Justice JON P. WILCOX, and Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY being of the opinion
that the decision should be affirmed, and Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON,
Justice DONALD W. STEINMETZ, and Justice JANINE P. GESKE being of the opinion
that the decision should be reversed.
Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH did not participate.
Accordingly, the decision of
the court of appeals is affirmed.
SUPREME
COURT OF WISCONSIN
Case No.: 93-2873
Complete Title
of Case: Russell M. Ware,
Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner,
v.
Adrian P. Schoone, Richard A. Fortune and
Mark J. Leuck,
Defendants-Respondents,
Schoone, Fortune & Leuck, S.C.,
Defendant.
________________________________________
REVIEW OF A DECISION
OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
Reported at: 191
Wis. 2d 359, 530 N.W.2d 69
(Ct. App. 1995)
UNPUBLISHED
Opinion Filed: March 29, 1996
Submitted on Briefs:
Oral Argument: February
27, 1996
Source of APPEAL
COURT: Circuit
COUNTY: Racine
JUDGE: JOHN R. RACE
JUSTICES:
Concurred:
Dissented:
Not Participating: BABLITCH, J., did not
participate
ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner
there were briefs by L. William Staudenmaier, Alexander T. Pendleton and
Cook & Franke, S.C., Milwaukee and oral argument by L. William
Staudenmaier.
For the
defendants-respondents there was a brief by Thomas M. Devine, David A. Wolfe
and Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C., Racine and oral argument by Thomas
M. Devine.