|
In re the Commitment of Derek Miller: State of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Derek Miller, Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner. |
|
REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF
APPEALS Reported at: 229 Wis. 2d 567, 600 N.W.2d 224 (Ct.
App. 1999-Published) |
|
Opinion
Filed: May 26, 2000 Oral
Argument: April 6, 2000 |
|
Source
of APPEAL COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Milwaukee JUDGE: Jeffrey A. Kremers |
|
JUSTICES: |
|
ATTORNEYS: For the respondent-appellant-petitioner there were briefs
and oral argument by Ellen Henak, assistant state public defender. For the
petitioner-respondent the cause was argued by Warren D. Weinstein,
assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle,
attorney general. |
2000 WI 44
NOTICE
This opinion is subject to further editing and
modification. The final version will
appear in the bound volume of the official reports.
STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT
FILED MAY 26, 2000 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Supreme
Court Madison, WI
In re the Commitment of Derek Miller:
State of Wisconsin,
Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
Derek Miller,
Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Dismissed as improvidently granted.
¶1 PER CURIAM. After examination of the record and the briefs of the parties, and after hearing oral argument, we conclude that the petition for review was improvidently granted.[1] Derek Miller, the petitioner, stipulated that he was a sexually violent person and raised issues about his placement. Because the statutes at issue have changed since the petitioner's case arose and the court of appeals has adequately addressed the issues raised by the parties, we conclude that this case does not meet our standards for review.
By the Court.—The review of the decision of the court of appeals is dismissed as improvidently granted.
¶2 DAVID T. PROSSER, J., did not participate.