SUPREME
COURT OF WISCONSIN
|
Case
No.: 98-1737 |
|
Complete
Title of
Case: |
|
Douglas-Hanson Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BF Goodrich Company, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. |
|
REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF
APPEALS Reported at: 229 Wis. 2d 132, 598 N.W.2d 262 (Ct.
App. 1999-Published) |
|
Opinion
Filed: March 10, 2000 Oral
Argument: February 29, 2000 |
|
Source
of APPEAL COURT: Circuit COUNTY: St. Croix JUDGE: Scott R. Needham |
|
JUSTICES: Not Participating: WILCOX, J. |
|
ATTORNEYS: For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by
Eric J. Magnuson, John B. Lunseth II and Rider, Bennett, Egan &
Arundel, LLP, Minneapolis, and Daniel W. Hildebrand and DeWitt
Ross & Stevens, Madison, and oral argument by Daniel W. Hildebrand. For the
plaintiff-respondent there was a brief by Michael R. Gray, Scott S.
Payzant and Mackall, Crounse & Moore, PLC, Minneapolis, and
oral argument by Scott S. Payzant. |
NOTICE
This opinion is subject to further editing and
modification. The final version will
appear in the bound volume of the official reports.
STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
FILED MAR 10, 2000 Cornelia G. Clark Acting Clerk of
Supreme Court Madison, WI
Douglas-Hanson Company, Inc.,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
BF Goodrich Company,
Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed.
¶1 PER CURIAM. The court is equally divided on the question of whether the published decision of the court of appeals, Douglas-Hanson Co., Inc. v. BF Goodrich Co., No. 98-1737 (June 29, 1999), should be affirmed or reversed. Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY, and Justice DAVID T. PROSSER would affirm; Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS, and Justice DIANE S. SYKES would reverse. Justice JON P. WILCOX did not participate.
¶2 Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.