Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1 - 10 of 1591 for br.

Circuit Courts
-0200 WOOD, HON. DANIEL G. Br 1 (608) 339-4215 Klaus, Kristi M. - Reporter Br 1 (608) 339-4214 BONNETT
/contact/Circuit_Courts.html - 2026-01-27

[PDF] Response Brief (Congressmen)
appear to agree, see generally Johnson Br.8–21; BLOC Br.3–22; Hunter Br.1–13; Citizen Math. Br.4– 19
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefcongressmen.pdf - 2021-11-01

[PDF] Interpreter Schedulers by County updated 1/12/2026
Assistant, Br. 2 Danielle.Neva@wicourts.gov Barron Debbie Nichols Judicial Assistant, Br. 3 Debbie.Nichols
/services/public/docs/interpschedulerscounty.pdf - 2026-01-12

[PDF] Reply Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (Evers)
, found that in total the Legislature’s maps move 108,469 more 6 people. (Johnson Resp. Br
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/replybrctoevers.pdf - 2022-01-05

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Nathan Atkinson, Stephen Joseph Wright, Gary Krenz, Sarah J. Hamilton, Jean-Luc Thiffeault, Somesh Jha, Joanne Kane, and Leah Dudley
for the 2024 election cycle. 1 This Response Brief refers to the parties’ October 16 Briefs as “Clarke Br
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030responsebriefatkinson.pdf - 2023-10-30

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Wisconsin Legislature and Republican Senator Respondents
,” contra Evers Br.32; they do not empower this Court to “prohibit the litigants” from basic dis- covery
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030responsebriefrepsen.pdf - 2023-10-30

[PDF] Motion to File Amicus-Non-Party Brief (Congressmen)
, No.2021AP1450-OA (Wis. Aug. 26, 2021) (hereinafter “August 26, 2021 Order”); Congressmen Nonparty Br.2–3
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motfileamicusnpbriefcongressmen.pdf - 2021-10-18

[PDF] Motion to Submit Modified Version of Proposed Congressional Map (Congressmen)
Commission, 2021 WI 87. See Br. Of Congressmen Supp. Their Proposed Congressional District Map, Johnson v
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motioncongressmen.pdf - 2022-01-03

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response of Intervenors-Petitioners Wright et al. to Consultants' Report
, which requires avoiding undue partisan impact.” Wright Remedial Response Br. 7 (Jan. 22, 2024
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0208intervenorspetitionersresponse.pdf - 2024-02-08

[PDF] Frontsheet
. § 48.685(5)(br)5. (2013-14). 1 1 Blake v. Jossart
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171250 - 2017-09-21