Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1 - 10 of 219 for ost.
Search results 1 - 10 of 219 for ost.
[PDF]
Appendix C: Complementary needs assessments
://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/148829NC JRS.pdf Offender Screening Tool (OST) http://www.azcourts.gov
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/needsassessmenttools.pdf - 2021-09-23
://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/148829NC JRS.pdf Offender Screening Tool (OST) http://www.azcourts.gov
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/needsassessmenttools.pdf - 2021-09-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
, “[c]osts may be allowed on a motion, in the discretion of the court or judge, not exceeding $300
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29759 - 2014-09-15
, “[c]osts may be allowed on a motion, in the discretion of the court or judge, not exceeding $300
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29759 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 814.07, “[c]osts may be allowed on a motion, in the discretion of the court or judge, not exceeding $300
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29759 - 2007-07-23
. § 814.07, “[c]osts may be allowed on a motion, in the discretion of the court or judge, not exceeding $300
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29759 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
Marian Steffens v. Vernon Steffens
that “[m]ost importantly, there has been a practical interpretation of the [order’s] language by both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13206 - 2017-09-21
that “[m]ost importantly, there has been a practical interpretation of the [order’s] language by both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13206 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the court ordered that Hipp “give a D.N.A. sample” and that “[c]osts of it are assessed on extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36866 - 2014-09-15
, the court ordered that Hipp “give a D.N.A. sample” and that “[c]osts of it are assessed on extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36866 - 2014-09-15
Marian Steffens v. Vernon Steffens
. The court went on to state that “[m]ost importantly, there has been a practical interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13206 - 2005-03-31
. The court went on to state that “[m]ost importantly, there has been a practical interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13206 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. At sentencing, the court ordered that Hipp “give a D.N.A. sample” and that “[c]osts of it are assessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36866 - 2009-06-22
. At sentencing, the court ordered that Hipp “give a D.N.A. sample” and that “[c]osts of it are assessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36866 - 2009-06-22
CA Blank Order
inconsistencies between the oral record and written judgment, “[m]ost notably in financial concerns, especially
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97559 - 2013-06-04
inconsistencies between the oral record and written judgment, “[m]ost notably in financial concerns, especially
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97559 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
result because “[m]ost of the relevant evidence was videos of the bar fight and [Polhamus’s] behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329165 - 2021-01-28
result because “[m]ost of the relevant evidence was videos of the bar fight and [Polhamus’s] behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329165 - 2021-01-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that there were glaring inconsistencies between the oral record and written judgment, “[m]ost notably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97559 - 2014-09-15
that there were glaring inconsistencies between the oral record and written judgment, “[m]ost notably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97559 - 2014-09-15