Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1 - 10 of 2752 for ti.
Search results 1 - 10 of 2752 for ti.
[PDF]
State v. Jose A. Trujillo
. Act 109 (TIS-II), does not amount to a new factor in regard to a sentence modification motion, where
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17865 - 2017-09-21
. Act 109 (TIS-II), does not amount to a new factor in regard to a sentence modification motion, where
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17865 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jose A. Trujillo
of burglary, which resulted from the truth-in-sentencing provisions of 2001 Wis. Act 109 (TIS-II), does
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17865 - 2014-10-06
of burglary, which resulted from the truth-in-sentencing provisions of 2001 Wis. Act 109 (TIS-II), does
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17865 - 2014-10-06
State v. James Hubert Tucker, Jr.
-in-sentencing provisions of 2001 Wis. Act 109 (TIS-II), constitute new factors in regard to a sentence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17866 - 2005-05-03
-in-sentencing provisions of 2001 Wis. Act 109 (TIS-II), constitute new factors in regard to a sentence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17866 - 2005-05-03
[PDF]
State v. James Hubert Tucker, Jr.
of 2001 Wis. Act 109 (TIS-II), constitute new factors in regard to a sentence modification motion, where
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17866 - 2017-09-21
of 2001 Wis. Act 109 (TIS-II), constitute new factors in regard to a sentence modification motion, where
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17866 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2021AP18-CR 3 in Sentencing (TIS) laws going into effect. See 1997 Wis. Act 283; 2001 Wis. Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608146 - 2023-01-10
No. 2021AP18-CR 3 in Sentencing (TIS) laws going into effect. See 1997 Wis. Act 283; 2001 Wis. Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608146 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
State v. Tommie L. Cole
to the provisions in the first phase of Wisconsin's Truth in Sentencing legislation (TIS- I). Specifically
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16603 - 2017-09-21
to the provisions in the first phase of Wisconsin's Truth in Sentencing legislation (TIS- I). Specifically
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16603 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tommie L. Cole
was subject to the provisions in the first phase of Wisconsin's Truth in Sentencing legislation (TIS-I
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16603 - 2005-03-31
was subject to the provisions in the first phase of Wisconsin's Truth in Sentencing legislation (TIS-I
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronnie L. Thums
scheme in place under TIS-I, Wisconsin’s original “truth in sentencing” statutes. Thums claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25945 - 2017-09-21
scheme in place under TIS-I, Wisconsin’s original “truth in sentencing” statutes. Thums claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25945 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ronnie L. Thums
in accordance with the penalty scheme in place under TIS-I, Wisconsin’s original “truth in sentencing” statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25945 - 2006-08-29
in accordance with the penalty scheme in place under TIS-I, Wisconsin’s original “truth in sentencing” statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25945 - 2006-08-29
State v. James D. Crochiere
continue to employ existing "new factor" jurisprudence for TIS-I sentences, while noting there may
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16647 - 2005-03-31
continue to employ existing "new factor" jurisprudence for TIS-I sentences, while noting there may
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16647 - 2005-03-31