Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1 - 10 of 202 for xi.

COURT OF APPEALS
appointment was permitted under Article XI of the collective bargaining agreement. Article XI is titled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82296 - 2012-05-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appointment was permitted under Article XI of the collective bargaining agreement. Article XI is titled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82296 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] League of Women Voters v. Madison Community Foundation
” members. At-large members are appointed by existing Board members. ¶3 Article XI of the trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19925 - 2017-09-21

League of Women Voters v. Madison Community Foundation
Article XI of the trust instrument provides a procedure for amending administrative provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19925 - 2005-12-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the original grantor or obtain the grantor’s consent to alter the use. See WIS. CONST. art. XI, § 3a;3 see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845487 - 2024-09-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” by § 62.50(3)(b). The appointment and promotion process is covered by Rule XI. Within that Rule, section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616559 - 2023-01-31

[PDF] WI APP 50
), the court discussed and applied language then contained in article XI, section 3 of the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62110 - 2014-09-15

WI App 50 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP857 Complete Title o...
then contained in article XI, section 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution and now contained in article XI, section 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62110 - 2011-04-19

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jeffrey A. Reitz
CLIENT C.K.——COUNTS XI AND XII ¶54 Reitz does not now challenge the referee's findings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17716 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jeffrey A. Reitz
, in violation of SCR 20:1.16(d).[12] CLIENT C.K.——COUNTS XI AND XII ¶54 Reitz does not now challenge
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17716 - 2005-04-13