Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11 - 20 of 468 for cat.
Search results 11 - 20 of 468 for cat.
COURT OF APPEALS
cats in her apartment, contrary to the lease terms. LaShay fought her eviction on multiple grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31456 - 2008-01-15
cats in her apartment, contrary to the lease terms. LaShay fought her eviction on multiple grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31456 - 2008-01-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
tenancy was terminated because she allegedly kept cats in her apartment, contrary to the lease terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31456 - 2014-09-15
tenancy was terminated because she allegedly kept cats in her apartment, contrary to the lease terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31456 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
VERGERONT, J.[1] This appeal arises out of a dispute over the ownership of a cat. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
VERGERONT, J.[1] This appeal arises out of a dispute over the ownership of a cat. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
[PDF]
State v. Freddy Viera
that the kitten was a stray cat and that Tremeear was not its owner. He also contends that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7788 - 2017-09-19
that the kitten was a stray cat and that Tremeear was not its owner. He also contends that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7788 - 2017-09-19
State v. Freddy Viera
in demonstrating that the kitten was a stray cat and that Tremeear was not its owner. He also contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7788 - 2005-03-31
in demonstrating that the kitten was a stray cat and that Tremeear was not its owner. He also contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7788 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the ownership of a cat. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77789 - 2014-09-15
the ownership of a cat. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77789 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Lindsay’s cat during an admitted prior nonconsensual entry into her home in October 2006. The October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73830 - 2014-09-15
Lindsay’s cat during an admitted prior nonconsensual entry into her home in October 2006. The October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73830 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with burglary with intent to steal Lindsay’s cat during an admitted prior nonconsensual entry into her home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73830 - 2011-11-14
with burglary with intent to steal Lindsay’s cat during an admitted prior nonconsensual entry into her home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73830 - 2011-11-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
domestic house pets, including cats, which I refer to as the “pet rule.” In addition to signing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995770 - 2025-08-21
domestic house pets, including cats, which I refer to as the “pet rule.” In addition to signing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995770 - 2025-08-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
by the phrase “No one is entitled to more than one kick at the cat.” Conway v. Division of Conservation, 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30662 - 2014-09-15
by the phrase “No one is entitled to more than one kick at the cat.” Conway v. Division of Conservation, 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30662 - 2014-09-15