Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11 - 20 of 474 for cat.
Search results 11 - 20 of 474 for cat.
COURT OF APPEALS
cats in her apartment, contrary to the lease terms. LaShay fought her eviction on multiple grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31456 - 2008-01-15
cats in her apartment, contrary to the lease terms. LaShay fought her eviction on multiple grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31456 - 2008-01-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
tenancy was terminated because she allegedly kept cats in her apartment, contrary to the lease terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31456 - 2014-09-15
tenancy was terminated because she allegedly kept cats in her apartment, contrary to the lease terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31456 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
VERGERONT, J.[1] This appeal arises out of a dispute over the ownership of a cat. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
VERGERONT, J.[1] This appeal arises out of a dispute over the ownership of a cat. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77789 - 2012-02-08
[PDF]
State v. Freddy Viera
that the kitten was a stray cat and that Tremeear was not its owner. He also contends that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7788 - 2017-09-19
that the kitten was a stray cat and that Tremeear was not its owner. He also contends that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7788 - 2017-09-19
State v. Freddy Viera
in demonstrating that the kitten was a stray cat and that Tremeear was not its owner. He also contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7788 - 2005-03-31
in demonstrating that the kitten was a stray cat and that Tremeear was not its owner. He also contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7788 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the ownership of a cat. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77789 - 2014-09-15
the ownership of a cat. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77789 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Lindsay’s cat during an admitted prior nonconsensual entry into her home in October 2006. The October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73830 - 2014-09-15
Lindsay’s cat during an admitted prior nonconsensual entry into her home in October 2006. The October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73830 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with burglary with intent to steal Lindsay’s cat during an admitted prior nonconsensual entry into her home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73830 - 2011-11-14
with burglary with intent to steal Lindsay’s cat during an admitted prior nonconsensual entry into her home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73830 - 2011-11-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
domestic house pets, including cats, which I refer to as the “pet rule.” In addition to signing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995770 - 2025-08-21
domestic house pets, including cats, which I refer to as the “pet rule.” In addition to signing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995770 - 2025-08-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 23, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of A...
succinctly summed up by the phrase “No one is entitled to more than one kick at the cat.” Conway v. Division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30662 - 2007-10-22
succinctly summed up by the phrase “No one is entitled to more than one kick at the cat.” Conway v. Division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30662 - 2007-10-22