Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11 - 20 of 215 for dha.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and Appeals (DHA) reversed the ALJ’s decision regarding the first alleged violation but sustained the ALJ’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622140 - 2023-02-15

COURT OF APPEALS
a Division of Hearings and Appeals (DHA) decision that an outdoor sign owned by Lamar Outdoor Advertising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107790 - 2014-02-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2013AP1188 2 (DHA) decision that an outdoor sign owned by Lamar Outdoor Advertising lost its legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107790 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and No. 2015AP1628 2 Appeals (DHA) appeal from a circuit court order reversing DHA’s decision to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172312 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
his probation. He argues on appeal that the Division of Hearings and Appeals (DHA) erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208821 - 2018-02-21

[PDF] Larry L. George v. David H. Schwarz
of the trial court that the Division of Hearings and Appeals (DHA) was bound by the guidelines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3114 - 2017-09-20

Larry L. George v. David H. Schwarz
that the Division of Hearings and Appeals (DHA) was bound by the guidelines of the Department of Corrections’s (DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3114 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals
reversing a decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals (DHA) and finding that Harley-Davidson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6932 - 2017-09-20

Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals
a decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals (DHA) and finding that Harley-Davidson is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6932 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Josephine Artac v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
of Hearings and Appeals (DHA) that Artac was ineligible for Medical Assistance (MA) benefits because she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15626 - 2017-09-21