Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11 - 20 of 42143 for samuel c. Gillen obit.

Frontsheet
filed). ABRAHAMSON, C. J. joins dissent. Not Participating: Attorneys
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67854 - 2011-07-31

[PDF] WI 71
filed). ABRAHAMSON, C. J. joins dissent. NOT PARTICIPATING: ATTORNEYS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67854 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 648 (1961). The Fullers characterized these decisions as obiter dicta. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167681 - 2017-09-21

Town of Burke v. City of Madison
precedence over the general notice requirements of § 893.80. Id. In Gillen v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14011 - 2005-03-31

Town of Burke v. City of Madison
precedence over the general notice requirements of § 893.80. Id. In Gillen v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13521 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Town of Burke v. City of Madison
the general notice requirements of § 893.80. Id. In Gillen v. City of Neenah, 219 Wis.2d 807, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14011 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Town of Burke v. City of Madison
the general notice requirements of § 893.80. Id. In Gillen v. City of Neenah, 219 Wis.2d 807, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13521 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Date: February 15, 2021
CountyName 2019AP002351 BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Paschen Gillen Skipper Ozaukee 2020AP001847 CRNM State v
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336713 - 2021-02-14

[PDF] NOTICE
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2007-08). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35791 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. The footnote was obiter dictum and we decline to follow it. Second, the dictum did not discuss how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35791 - 2009-03-10