Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11 - 20 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 11 - 20 of 58340 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional right to a speedy trial, the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his status as a co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38501 - 2009-07-28
constitutional right to a speedy trial, the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his status as a co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38501 - 2009-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. This court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680086 - 2023-07-19
, a violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. This court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680086 - 2023-07-19
07AP1521 State v. Tyler J.K.
to a speedy trial had been violated. Tyler asserts that the bulk of the 959 days the fact-finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31564 - 2008-01-22
to a speedy trial had been violated. Tyler asserts that the bulk of the 959 days the fact-finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31564 - 2008-01-22
State v. Dennis R. Hyland
right to a speedy trial was violated. Although our analysis differs somewhat from that of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5237 - 2005-03-31
right to a speedy trial was violated. Although our analysis differs somewhat from that of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5237 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Hyland
-CR 2 his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial was violated. Although our analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5237 - 2017-09-19
-CR 2 his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial was violated. Although our analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5237 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Nicole M. Schoepke
dismissing the charges against Nicole Schoepke. The issue is whether Schoepke’s right to a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6589 - 2017-09-19
dismissing the charges against Nicole Schoepke. The issue is whether Schoepke’s right to a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6589 - 2017-09-19
State v. Nicole M. Schoepke
is whether Schoepke’s right to a speedy trial was violated. We conclude that it was not and reverse. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6589 - 2005-03-31
is whether Schoepke’s right to a speedy trial was violated. We conclude that it was not and reverse. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6589 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard A. Dodson
) (2001-02).[1] His contention is that both his constitutional right to a speedy trial and his statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4941 - 2005-03-31
) (2001-02).[1] His contention is that both his constitutional right to a speedy trial and his statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4941 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Dodson
. No. 02-0425-CR 2 right to a speedy trial and his statutory right to a speedy trial were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4941 - 2017-09-19
. No. 02-0425-CR 2 right to a speedy trial and his statutory right to a speedy trial were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4941 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tina M. Satzke
unsuccessfully argued to the trial court that the delay violated her rights to a speedy trial. She was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24705 - 2017-09-21
unsuccessfully argued to the trial court that the delay violated her rights to a speedy trial. She was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24705 - 2017-09-21