Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 101 - 110 of 58198 for WA 0852 2611 9.
Search results 101 - 110 of 58198 for WA 0852 2611 9.
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Tucker
summarily denied the motion as insufficient, ruling that “[t]here [wa]s no factual support for his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25563 - 2017-09-21
summarily denied the motion as insufficient, ruling that “[t]here [wa]s no factual support for his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25563 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert E. Tucker
plea. The trial court summarily denied the motion as insufficient, ruling that “[t]here [wa]s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25563 - 2006-06-22
plea. The trial court summarily denied the motion as insufficient, ruling that “[t]here [wa]s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25563 - 2006-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas S. Cole
transcript of the plea hearing was ordered or prepared, and therefore, the court [wa]s unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25414 - 2017-09-21
transcript of the plea hearing was ordered or prepared, and therefore, the court [wa]s unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25414 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nicholas S. Cole
or prepared, and therefore, the court [wa]s unable to intelligently evaluate the defendant’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25414 - 2006-06-05
or prepared, and therefore, the court [wa]s unable to intelligently evaluate the defendant’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25414 - 2006-06-05
[PDF]
March 2009 Unpublished Orders
2008AP001061 CR State v. Manuel R. Perez 2008AP001137 CR State v. Paul Wa Tou Xiong 2008AP001193 Brian C
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36025 - 2014-09-15
2008AP001061 CR State v. Manuel R. Perez 2008AP001137 CR State v. Paul Wa Tou Xiong 2008AP001193 Brian C
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36025 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
otherwise permitted under § 632.32(5)(j) [wa]s barred” because § 632.32(6)(d) prohibits anti-stacking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102508 - 2013-09-26
otherwise permitted under § 632.32(5)(j) [wa]s barred” because § 632.32(6)(d) prohibits anti-stacking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102508 - 2013-09-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
recollection of Cucuta’s trial. ¶9 Cucuta testified that Berg had alerted him during a recess that a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43255 - 2014-09-15
recollection of Cucuta’s trial. ¶9 Cucuta testified that Berg had alerted him during a recess that a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43255 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Barbara J. King v. JiffyLube Wisconsin
care because the danger was open and obvious. The trial court found that “this [wa]s a clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11197 - 2017-09-19
care because the danger was open and obvious. The trial court found that “this [wa]s a clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11197 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
recollection of Cucuta’s trial. ¶9 Cucuta testified that Berg had alerted him during a recess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43255 - 2009-11-16
recollection of Cucuta’s trial. ¶9 Cucuta testified that Berg had alerted him during a recess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43255 - 2009-11-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
in order to determine whether the person [wa]s in fact carrying a weapon and to neutralize the threat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
in order to determine whether the person [wa]s in fact carrying a weapon and to neutralize the threat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15