Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 101 - 110 of 614 for ir.
Search results 101 - 110 of 614 for ir.
Leslie L. Kuper v. Craig A. Kuper
that if the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) disallowed the § 71 payments, the agreement would be modified to denote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2504 - 2005-03-31
that if the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) disallowed the § 71 payments, the agreement would be modified to denote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2504 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Trust Point’s accounts when Trust Point’s representations to the IRS about how much trust income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138946 - 2017-09-21
Trust Point’s accounts when Trust Point’s representations to the IRS about how much trust income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138946 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 2, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
in approving Trust Point’s accounts when Trust Point’s representations to the IRS about how much trust income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138946 - 2015-04-01
in approving Trust Point’s accounts when Trust Point’s representations to the IRS about how much trust income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138946 - 2015-04-01
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert J. Urban
, when the IRS issued the closing letter for the Flicek Estate on June 3, 1997, that letter reflected
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16611 - 2017-09-21
, when the IRS issued the closing letter for the Flicek Estate on June 3, 1997, that letter reflected
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16611 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert J. Urban
return indicating that a refund of $84,007.94 was owed to the estate. However, when the IRS issued
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16611 - 2005-03-31
return indicating that a refund of $84,007.94 was owed to the estate. However, when the IRS issued
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16611 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) before May 2013, the investors received IRS Schedule K-1 Forms, purporting to reflect the annual status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238248 - 2019-03-28
) before May 2013, the investors received IRS Schedule K-1 Forms, purporting to reflect the annual status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238248 - 2019-03-28
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Service (IRS) sent Attorney Knapp a Notice of Levy on Wages, Salary and Other Income relating to T.B
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340370 - 2021-02-25
Service (IRS) sent Attorney Knapp a Notice of Levy on Wages, Salary and Other Income relating to T.B
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340370 - 2021-02-25
Frontsheet
the clients or other sources. ¶10 In May 2002, the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) notified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143512 - 2015-06-23
the clients or other sources. ¶10 In May 2002, the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) notified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143512 - 2015-06-23
[PDF]
Frontsheet
sources. ¶10 In May 2002, the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) notified the couple
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143512 - 2017-09-21
sources. ¶10 In May 2002, the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) notified the couple
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143512 - 2017-09-21
Richard J. Schleife v. Marquip, Inc.
to fulfill preconditions of the contract, did not meet the IRS definition of an employee, provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8709 - 2005-03-31
to fulfill preconditions of the contract, did not meet the IRS definition of an employee, provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8709 - 2005-03-31