Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 101 - 110 of 81648 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

State v. Bobby R. Dabney
out that the original complaint states that the DNA sample was tested earlier, but no match was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5656 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bobby R. Dabney
refutes this allegation, pointing out that the original complaint states that the DNA sample was tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5656 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Drug court practitioner fact sheet: The marijuana detection window -- Determining the length of
result possibilities demonstrates this point. If a drug court sample tests negative for cannabinoids
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/thcdetectionwindow.pdf - 2021-09-23

[PDF] WI APP 73
to a blood test. When she later moved to retest the blood sample, it had been destroyed. The admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115306 - 2017-09-21

WI App 73 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP218-CR Complete Title ...
drugs. Finally, in February 2010, another test of the sample confirmed the presence of THC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115306 - 2014-07-29

State v. Douglass Potter
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6662 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, V. J. L. A., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673275 - 2023-06-27

[PDF] Certification
the cost of the DNA ‘analysis’ of the biological specimen that the circuit court must order a defendant
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177817 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 41
DNA was detected in various tests of samples from the vaginal area, nor was male DNA found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242856 - 2019-09-17

[PDF] State v. Douglass Potter
to order a DNA sample be taken before it can impose a DNA surcharge. We disagree. No. 03-1834
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6662 - 2017-09-20