Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 101 - 110 of 162 for ott.

Jose DeJesus Fuentes v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV
the record itself which must be inadvertently done to fall within this exception. Ott v. Boring, 131 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17405 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Carol J.R. v. County of Milwaukee
on the briefs of Robert G. Ott, corporation counsel, with Robert A. McKnight, principal assistant corporation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7801 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Disposition table for May & June 2005
., dissent. 6/1/2005 2003AP3427 Ott v. LIRC Bradley, J., dissents. 5/11/2005 2003AP3446-CR
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19084 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Paula M.S. v. Neal A.R.
A. Curtes of Kramer & Ott, S.C. of Mt. Horeb. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13923 - 2014-09-15

Paula M.S. v. Neal A.R.
was submitted on the brief of Cynthia A. Curtes of Kramer & Ott, S.C. of Mt. Horeb. COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13923 - 2005-03-31

Jodee G. Kox v. Center for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Cynthia A. Curtes of Kramer & Ott, S.C., of Mt. Horeb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13156 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jodee G. Kox v. Center for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
of Cynthia A. Curtes of Kramer & Ott, S.C., of Mt. Horeb. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13156 - 2017-09-21

State v. Nathaniel Crampton
been improper is undermined by State v. Ott, 111 Wis.2d 691, 695-96, 331 N.W.2d 629, 631 (Ct. App. 1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13383 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Nathaniel Crampton
by State v. Ott, 111 Wis.2d 691, 695-96, 331 N.W.2d 629, 631 (Ct. App. 1983) (Where, during deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13383 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
definitions or penalties conflicted with the trial court’s instructions. Cf. State v. Ott, 111 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36798 - 2014-09-15