Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 101 - 110 of 155 for parrot.
Search results 101 - 110 of 155 for parrot.
[PDF]
Certification
at the hearing on this issue “merely parroted the statutory language without providing details
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138614 - 2017-09-21
at the hearing on this issue “merely parroted the statutory language without providing details
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138614 - 2017-09-21
Certification
or treatment because the testimony presented at the hearing on this issue “merely parroted the statutory
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138614 - 2015-03-31
or treatment because the testimony presented at the hearing on this issue “merely parroted the statutory
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138614 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the dangerousness standard, “conclusory opinions parroting the statutory language without actually discussing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043059 - 2025-11-26
the dangerousness standard, “conclusory opinions parroting the statutory language without actually discussing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043059 - 2025-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and it may not simply parrot the language of the applicable statute. Lamar Cent. Outdoor, Inc. v. Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804046 - 2024-05-21
, and it may not simply parrot the language of the applicable statute. Lamar Cent. Outdoor, Inc. v. Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804046 - 2024-05-21
2010 WI APP 89
directed at invalidating Oregon’s assisted suicide statute where the Interpretive Rule merely “parrot[ted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51321 - 2011-08-21
directed at invalidating Oregon’s assisted suicide statute where the Interpretive Rule merely “parrot[ted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51321 - 2011-08-21
[PDF]
WI APP 89
“parrot[ted]” language in the federal Controlled Substances Act. Id. at 257. As the State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51321 - 2014-09-15
“parrot[ted]” language in the federal Controlled Substances Act. Id. at 257. As the State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51321 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
VerWert’s testimony that he did not merely parrot the statutory definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611232 - 2023-01-18
VerWert’s testimony that he did not merely parrot the statutory definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611232 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
some persuasive value in the State parroting the PSI’s recommendation, we cannot say that the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670974 - 2023-06-27
some persuasive value in the State parroting the PSI’s recommendation, we cannot say that the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670974 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did “more than merely parrot the statute’s requirements or make legal conclusions” and contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100808 - 2017-09-21
did “more than merely parrot the statute’s requirements or make legal conclusions” and contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100808 - 2017-09-21
Jeffrey D. Knickmeier v. James E. Reinke
were insufficient for two reasons. First, the findings parroted the language of the termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26006 - 2006-07-26
were insufficient for two reasons. First, the findings parroted the language of the termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26006 - 2006-07-26