Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1001 - 1010 of 6253 for cf.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. MacLaren, 2:18-CV-11243, 2019WL1002609 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 1, 2019) for its persuasive value. Cf. WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327603 - 2021-01-26

[PDF] State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
on drug charges in Case No. 91-CF-518, Dane County Circuit Court. After Cardenas-Hernandez entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11857 - 2017-09-21

State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
charges in Case No. 91-CF-518, Dane County Circuit Court. After Cardenas-Hernandez entered a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11857 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael D. Lewis
Acknowledgment in the record applies to No. 02‑CF‑275; however, it references charges of theft and first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7085 - 2005-03-31

Patricia Moran v. Milwaukee County
with Rule 801.11(4)1. Cf. Medley v. City of Milwaukee, 969 F.2d 312, 320 (7th Cir. 1992) (service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7380 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson
-CF-319 96-CF-323 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4687 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson
-CF-319 96-CF-323 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4688 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the circuit court did not believe King’s testimony regarding her observations. Cf. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30786 - 2007-11-05

COURT OF APPEALS
, found in § 973.055, should be vacated. Cf. State v. Cherry, 2008 WI App 80, ¶11, 312 Wis. 2d 203, 752
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107713 - 2014-02-03

wi app 12 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP767-CR Complete Title ...
. As such, determining the meaning of the word in a jury instruction is a legal question that we review de novo. Cf. id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132253 - 2015-03-11