Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1001 - 1010 of 2418 for ny.

Catharine M. Lawton v. Town of Barton
of the open meetings law. See Wis. Stat. § 19.96 (providing that “[a]ny member of a governmental body who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7364 - 2005-03-31

Jason E. Kellner v. Richard Christian
of Wis. Stat. § 887.03. Section 887.03 states that "[a]ny oath or affidavit required or authorized
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16864 - 2005-03-31

Robert Meixelsperger v. Debbra L. Meixelsperger
to consider “[a]ny mutual agreement made by the parties before or during the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12816 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
World’s argument ignores Section 2.1(b), which provides that “[a]ny regulatory monitoring that [Prime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36420 - 2009-05-07

[PDF] Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
of personal wireless services.” Id. at § 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(I), (II). It additionally provides that “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Paul W.
Prior to the commencement of the trial, the County moved to exclude “[a]ny evidence regarding possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5867 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
., such an exception exists for “[a]ny record containing personally identifiable information that is collected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111905 - 2014-05-12

[PDF] Tyler Dorbritz v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
coverage for “[a]ny person using such a vehicle,” applies only to cars owned or leased by the named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18136 - 2017-09-21

State v. Dion C. Mitchell
, ¶17, 236 Wis. 2d 521, 613 N.W.2d 170. It “does not require the existence of a[ny] particular state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6225 - 2005-03-31

City of Milwaukee v. Brahim Arrieh
Drug Abatement Law declares to be a nuisance “[a]ny building or structure that is used to facilitate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10400 - 2005-03-31