Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1001 - 1010 of 9126 for op.
Search results 1001 - 1010 of 9126 for op.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2009AP1626, unpublished slip op. ¶9 (WI App May 11, 2010); see also WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3)(b). S.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263198 - 2020-06-10
, No. 2009AP1626, unpublished slip op. ¶9 (WI App May 11, 2010); see also WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3)(b). S.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263198 - 2020-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and denied Bell’s motion. We affirmed. State v. Bell, No. 2009AP2281, unpublished slip op. (WI App Feb. 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238404 - 2019-04-03
and denied Bell’s motion. We affirmed. State v. Bell, No. 2009AP2281, unpublished slip op. (WI App Feb. 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238404 - 2019-04-03
[PDF]
William A. Pangman v. Shawano County
referring to Minniecheske v. Tigerton, No. 95-2993, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. June 25, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13693 - 2014-09-15
referring to Minniecheske v. Tigerton, No. 95-2993, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. June 25, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13693 - 2014-09-15
William A. Pangman v. Shawano County
grounds in Minniecheske v. Tigerton, No. 95‑2993, unpublished slip. op. (Wis. Ct. App. June 25, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13693 - 2005-03-31
grounds in Minniecheske v. Tigerton, No. 95‑2993, unpublished slip. op. (Wis. Ct. App. June 25, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13693 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Flowers, No. 2010AP1709-CR, unpublished slip op., ¶1 (WI App Oct. 18, 2011). The supreme court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174961 - 2017-09-21
. Flowers, No. 2010AP1709-CR, unpublished slip op., ¶1 (WI App Oct. 18, 2011). The supreme court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174961 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
complied” with the statutory mandate. See State v. Mursal, No. 2012AP2775, unpublished slip op. ¶¶15-17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103241 - 2017-09-21
complied” with the statutory mandate. See State v. Mursal, No. 2012AP2775, unpublished slip op. ¶¶15-17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103241 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2004AP3364-CR, unpublished slip op., ¶1 (WI App Nov. 23, 2005) (Leiser I). We disagreed, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111905 - 2017-09-21
, No. 2004AP3364-CR, unpublished slip op., ¶1 (WI App Nov. 23, 2005) (Leiser I). We disagreed, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111905 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of intoxication. In support of his argument, Resch cites to State v. Meye, No. 2010AP336, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63016 - 2011-04-26
of intoxication. In support of his argument, Resch cites to State v. Meye, No. 2010AP336, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63016 - 2011-04-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Holmes declined to file a reply brief contesting the State’s response. See United Co-op. v. Frontier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969905 - 2025-06-17
. Holmes declined to file a reply brief contesting the State’s response. See United Co-op. v. Frontier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969905 - 2025-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and possession of a firearm by a felon. State v. Richard, No. 2008AP1853-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶¶2-7 (WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138192 - 2017-09-21
, and possession of a firearm by a felon. State v. Richard, No. 2008AP1853-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶¶2-7 (WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138192 - 2017-09-21