Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1001 - 1010 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 1001 - 1010 of 12912 for prosecuting.
State v. Steven W. Gauerke
identifies several specific gaps in the prosecution’s case that he believes destroyed his plea’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12023 - 2005-03-31
identifies several specific gaps in the prosecution’s case that he believes destroyed his plea’s factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12023 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark H. Price
, Price argues that the repeat offender portion of the sentence is void because the prosecution did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2013-04-10
, Price argues that the repeat offender portion of the sentence is void because the prosecution did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2013-04-10
Frontsheet
three days of testimony. The prosecution presented the following witnesses in addition to the officers
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59825 - 2011-02-08
three days of testimony. The prosecution presented the following witnesses in addition to the officers
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59825 - 2011-02-08
2010 WI APP 137
juvenile alleged to be delinquent for violating a state law. Wis. Stat. § 938.12(1).[2] For prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54419 - 2010-10-26
juvenile alleged to be delinquent for violating a state law. Wis. Stat. § 938.12(1).[2] For prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54419 - 2010-10-26
State v. Michael Marks
contends that the second prosecution was improper because the first case should have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
contends that the second prosecution was improper because the first case should have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a criminal prosecution. McNeil, 501 U.S. at 175. The right to counsel is “offense specific”; it cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35908 - 2009-03-17
of a criminal prosecution. McNeil, 501 U.S. at 175. The right to counsel is “offense specific”; it cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35908 - 2009-03-17
State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
delivery counts on grounds that the charges were the result of vindictive prosecution. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2732 - 2005-03-31
delivery counts on grounds that the charges were the result of vindictive prosecution. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2732 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kathleen A. Krogman
, the slate is wiped clean and this matter should have been prosecuted as a first offense, forfeiture action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14367 - 2005-03-31
, the slate is wiped clean and this matter should have been prosecuted as a first offense, forfeiture action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
that the charges were the result of vindictive prosecution. The trial court denied his motion and this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2732 - 2017-09-19
that the charges were the result of vindictive prosecution. The trial court denied his motion and this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2732 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
that the charges were the result of vindictive prosecution. The trial court denied his motion and this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2731 - 2017-09-19
that the charges were the result of vindictive prosecution. The trial court denied his motion and this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2731 - 2017-09-19