Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10001 - 10010 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] County of LaCrosse v. George K.
on its findings that George K. has a primary need for residential care and custody, that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10748 - 2017-09-20

State v. Joseph McGowan
A prisoner is eligible for credit against a sentence for time spent in custody in connection with the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5666 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CV-441; Order on Prisoner's Petition for Waiver of Prepayment of Fees/Costs Based on Imminent
custody of the prisoner's prison trust fund and/or release account to forward payments from
/formdisplay/CV-441.pdf?formNumber=CV-441&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-02-21

COURT OF APPEALS
erred when it denied his motion to suppress statements made after he had asserted his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30311 - 2007-09-18

[PDF] NOTICE
in violation of WIS. STAT. § 940.11(2). He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30311 - 2014-09-15

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
negligent and found that each was equally at fault. Matsen filed motions after verdict on the grounds
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=531&year=2014

[PDF] Cynthia A. Schultz v. Charles J. Sykes
1 For the sake of brevity and because they have filed a joint brief, we will refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2455 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, prior to the contested hearing, Megan filed a motion to dismiss Dawn’s petition for grandparent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964656 - 2025-06-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
motion for a new trial. No. 2015AP2381-CR 2 ¶2 “Girl A” and “Girl B,” ages fourteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176612 - 2017-09-21

State v. Sarah R.P.
Thereafter, Sarah’s attorney renewed the motion to dismiss the petition, and at the dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2890 - 2005-03-31