Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10001 - 10010 of 15404 for probate.
Search results 10001 - 10010 of 15404 for probate.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Andrew L. Hunsick
convicted. On October 23, 2000, sentence was withheld with Attorney Hunsick placed on probation for 18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16505 - 2005-03-31
convicted. On October 23, 2000, sentence was withheld with Attorney Hunsick placed on probation for 18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16505 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
safely and effectively in the community; and (3) imposing terms and conditions of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237973 - 2019-03-26
safely and effectively in the community; and (3) imposing terms and conditions of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237973 - 2019-03-26
[PDF]
State v. James E.J.
an extensive record, including operating autos, fleeing offenses, and going AWOL from his probation program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12707 - 2017-09-21
an extensive record, including operating autos, fleeing offenses, and going AWOL from his probation program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12707 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
was in response to a sentencing memorandum on Ramuta’s behalf that recommended probation. The court said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
was in response to a sentencing memorandum on Ramuta’s behalf that recommended probation. The court said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, with two years of probation and sixty days of conditional jail time. Attorney Buffum, who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131189 - 2017-09-21
, with two years of probation and sixty days of conditional jail time. Attorney Buffum, who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131189 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
or probation revocation. See State ex rel. Cramer v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 2000 WI 86, ¶28, 236 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116632 - 2014-07-08
or probation revocation. See State ex rel. Cramer v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 2000 WI 86, ¶28, 236 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116632 - 2014-07-08
Randy D. Schwartz v. North Farm Cooperative
time for any lawful reason by any party." NFC also brought out that Schwartz was on probation when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8977 - 2005-03-31
time for any lawful reason by any party." NFC also brought out that Schwartz was on probation when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8977 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. On the second charge, it ordered a consecutive period of probation. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825163 - 2024-07-17
of extended supervision. On the second charge, it ordered a consecutive period of probation. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825163 - 2024-07-17
[PDF]
Irene Dittberner v. Allen G. Luebke
representative, … to permit any of the beneficiaries named hereto to enjoy the use in kind, during the probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15710 - 2017-09-21
representative, … to permit any of the beneficiaries named hereto to enjoy the use in kind, during the probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15710 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. On the second charge, it ordered a consecutive period of probation. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825163 - 2024-07-17
of extended supervision. On the second charge, it ordered a consecutive period of probation. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825163 - 2024-07-17