Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10011 - 10020 of 68530 for did.
Search results 10011 - 10020 of 68530 for did.
State v. Andrew Newson
. The trial court’s findings of what counsel did and the basis for the challenged conduct are factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18855 - 2005-07-05
. The trial court’s findings of what counsel did and the basis for the challenged conduct are factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18855 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged unreasonable delay in reporting the misconduct to the defense. The court did not dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29
alleged unreasonable delay in reporting the misconduct to the defense. The court did not dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the nuisance ordinance did not regulate grass height. In his brief in support of his motion, Pasternak also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115741 - 2017-09-21
the nuisance ordinance did not regulate grass height. In his brief in support of his motion, Pasternak also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115741 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interaction with a woman suspected to be a drug user, but did not witness an exchange of any sort.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258474 - 2020-04-28
interaction with a woman suspected to be a drug user, but did not witness an exchange of any sort.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258474 - 2020-04-28
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Kimberly A.M.
to be able to have a confidential conversation with the judge. Kimberly’s trial counsel did not attend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4185 - 2017-09-19
to be able to have a confidential conversation with the judge. Kimberly’s trial counsel did not attend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4185 - 2017-09-19
Eugene Stern v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
was enacted, that DHFS appeals. The trial court did not address Stern’s request for a special factor increase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14066 - 2005-03-31
was enacted, that DHFS appeals. The trial court did not address Stern’s request for a special factor increase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14066 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
committed). ¶8 Cobbs did not object to the standard unanimity instruction that was given to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31601 - 2014-09-15
committed). ¶8 Cobbs did not object to the standard unanimity instruction that was given to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31601 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
radiologist, to perform it. The primary physician did not advise Dr. Bartel that Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90059 - 2014-09-15
radiologist, to perform it. The primary physician did not advise Dr. Bartel that Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90059 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
Margaret’s claim that Manuel did nothing in those areas; that Manuel is only minimally able to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55084 - 2014-09-15
Margaret’s claim that Manuel did nothing in those areas; that Manuel is only minimally able to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55084 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, she also testified that she did not think Lelinski was there in his official capacity, because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108345 - 2014-02-24
, she also testified that she did not think Lelinski was there in his official capacity, because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108345 - 2014-02-24