Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10011 - 10020 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 10011 - 10020 of 58506 for speedy trial.
State v. Everett L.O.
, contrary to § 946.41(1), Stats. He argues that the trial court erred by refusing to give an instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11779 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 946.41(1), Stats. He argues that the trial court erred by refusing to give an instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11779 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The father initially contested the TPR petitions and a jury trial was scheduled on the grounds phase,5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252609 - 2020-01-23
The father initially contested the TPR petitions and a jury trial was scheduled on the grounds phase,5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252609 - 2020-01-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial.2 In the alternative, he asks this court to order a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241171 - 2019-05-29
trial.2 In the alternative, he asks this court to order a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241171 - 2019-05-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Moffett claims the trial 1 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28567 - 2014-09-15
. Moffett claims the trial 1 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28567 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
trial and postverdict motions. He raises several contentions: (1) the trial court erred in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32631 - 2008-05-05
trial and postverdict motions. He raises several contentions: (1) the trial court erred in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32631 - 2008-05-05
Con-Way Central Express, Inc. v. Super Valu Stores, Inc.
operation between 1990 and 1992. After a bench trial, the court rejected the vast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9729 - 2005-03-31
operation between 1990 and 1992. After a bench trial, the court rejected the vast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9729 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
), and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Brock argues that: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52601 - 2010-07-26
), and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Brock argues that: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52601 - 2010-07-26
[PDF]
Racine County Human Services Department v. Lakisha G.
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. 1 Lakisha G. appeals from a trial court order terminating her parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7013 - 2017-09-20
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. 1 Lakisha G. appeals from a trial court order terminating her parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7013 - 2017-09-20
State v. Samuel M. Munoz
trial. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his request for an in camera inspection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8861 - 2005-03-31
trial. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his request for an in camera inspection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8861 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Allen
from an order denying his postconviction motion. Allen alleges that: (1) his trial counsel rendered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5695 - 2005-03-31
from an order denying his postconviction motion. Allen alleges that: (1) his trial counsel rendered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5695 - 2005-03-31