Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10021 - 10030 of 73033 for petition.
Search results 10021 - 10030 of 73033 for petition.
[PDF]
Patricia M. Marohl v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6002 - 2017-09-19
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6002 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Eberhardy filed a petition for final judgment for the Estate with the circuit court on July 28, 2022
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822771 - 2024-07-09
Eberhardy filed a petition for final judgment for the Estate with the circuit court on July 28, 2022
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822771 - 2024-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
Dismissals 1 0 0 1 2 Stipulations 0 3 2 0 5 Other 23 26 14 11 74 Motions and Petitions: Motions
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108645 - 2017-09-21
Dismissals 1 0 0 1 2 Stipulations 0 3 2 0 5 Other 23 26 14 11 74 Motions and Petitions: Motions
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108645 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and affirms the orders. The petitions for termination of parental rights alleged that Mandy had failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132562 - 2017-09-21
and affirms the orders. The petitions for termination of parental rights alleged that Mandy had failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132562 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
116 Dismissals 2 5 2 8 17 Stipulations 2 2 1 0 5 Other 17 9 13 1 40 Motions and Petitions
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15
116 Dismissals 2 5 2 8 17 Stipulations 2 2 1 0 5 Other 17 9 13 1 40 Motions and Petitions
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. Rule 809.21(1). We summarily affirm the orders. In October 2007, the State filed a petition to have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104555 - 2013-11-14
. Rule 809.21(1). We summarily affirm the orders. In October 2007, the State filed a petition to have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104555 - 2013-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81880 - 2012-04-30
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81880 - 2012-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was put in place and Waukesha County filed a three-party petition for a WIS. STAT. § 51.20 examination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233700 - 2019-01-30
was put in place and Waukesha County filed a three-party petition for a WIS. STAT. § 51.20 examination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233700 - 2019-01-30
County of Rusk v. Rusk County Board of Adjustment
on the petitioner’s right to obtain review once the petition has been timely filed. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13582 - 2005-03-31
on the petitioner’s right to obtain review once the petition has been timely filed. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13582 - 2005-03-31
James L. Koskey v. The Town of Bergen
No.: 99-2192 Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review Filed James L. Koskey and Carrie J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15899 - 2005-03-31
No.: 99-2192 Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review Filed James L. Koskey and Carrie J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15899 - 2005-03-31