Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10031 - 10040 of 30191 for de.
Search results 10031 - 10040 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
violates the rule of prior precedence, a question of law that we review de novo. Town of Delavan v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5205 - 2017-09-19
violates the rule of prior precedence, a question of law that we review de novo. Town of Delavan v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5205 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark O. Williams
of a statute to undisputed facts, an issue of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Dentici, 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
of a statute to undisputed facts, an issue of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Dentici, 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of judicial policy derived from an unidentified legal source. In either case, we review the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174184 - 2017-09-21
of judicial policy derived from an unidentified legal source. In either case, we review the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174184 - 2017-09-21
Keric T. Dechant v. Monarch Life Insurance Company
Complete Title of Case: KERIC T. DE CHANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7707 - 2005-03-31
Complete Title of Case: KERIC T. DE CHANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7707 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 157
. § 802.08(2) (2007-08). We review summary judgment decisions de novo, without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55694 - 2014-09-15
. § 802.08(2) (2007-08). We review summary judgment decisions de novo, without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55694 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for an erroneous exercise of discretion, we analyze de novo whether a trial court’s exclusion of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982962 - 2025-07-16
for an erroneous exercise of discretion, we analyze de novo whether a trial court’s exclusion of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982962 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
WI APP 112
, the statutes governing wind energy systems. These are questions of law we review de novo. Nischke v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37593 - 2014-09-15
, the statutes governing wind energy systems. These are questions of law we review de novo. Nischke v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37593 - 2014-09-15
State v. Scott K. Seal
) presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5270 - 2005-03-31
) presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5270 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, reversing if the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253986 - 2020-02-13
. We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, reversing if the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253986 - 2020-02-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but we review de novo whether counsel’s conduct constitutes constitutionally ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798404 - 2024-05-08
, but we review de novo whether counsel’s conduct constitutes constitutionally ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798404 - 2024-05-08