Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10041 - 10050 of 19288 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 10041 - 10050 of 19288 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Edward G. Harris
Jeremy Miller sign an affidavit. The caption on the affidavit listed the case number as 98-SC-2790
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16595 - 2017-09-21
Jeremy Miller sign an affidavit. The caption on the affidavit listed the case number as 98-SC-2790
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16595 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 59
1 Some of the background facts in this case derive from an affidavit that was signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62340 - 2014-09-15
1 Some of the background facts in this case derive from an affidavit that was signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62340 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 75
with an affidavit of counsel. 3 He asserted that, subsequent to the entry of the divorce judgment, Shirley had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198167 - 2018-08-23
with an affidavit of counsel. 3 He asserted that, subsequent to the entry of the divorce judgment, Shirley had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198167 - 2018-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS
on the grounds that Roche had not freely given consent to search the apartment. According to Roche’s affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
on the grounds that Roche had not freely given consent to search the apartment. According to Roche’s affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In their respective affidavits opposing summary judgment, the DeWalls each averred that they do not recall “anyone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68843 - 2014-09-15
In their respective affidavits opposing summary judgment, the DeWalls each averred that they do not recall “anyone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68843 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration, failed to support that motion with affidavits, and failed to provide an adequate record on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145464 - 2015-07-30
for reconsideration, failed to support that motion with affidavits, and failed to provide an adequate record on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145464 - 2015-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and demonstrate the existence of factual issues, a court next considers the moving party’s affidavits or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967321 - 2025-06-10
and demonstrate the existence of factual issues, a court next considers the moving party’s affidavits or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967321 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
faulted King for not making his allegations via affidavit. The State echoes this “requirement” in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106756 - 2017-09-21
faulted King for not making his allegations via affidavit. The State echoes this “requirement” in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106756 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
documents that included a brief and an affidavit by David, arguing that Edith made improper use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144176 - 2015-07-08
documents that included a brief and an affidavit by David, arguing that Edith made improper use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144176 - 2015-07-08
COURT OF APPEALS
; it also discussed the merits. In so doing, it found that Claudio’s affidavit was “completely at odds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35646 - 2009-02-23
; it also discussed the merits. In so doing, it found that Claudio’s affidavit was “completely at odds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35646 - 2009-02-23