Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10051 - 10060 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 10051 - 10060 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Derrick L. Madlock
an order denying his motion to vacate the restitution portion of a judgment of conviction for operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his motion to vacate the restitution portion of a judgment of conviction for operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21
IBEW Local Union No. 2150 v. Rodney Stone
to enforce a $10,000 fine against Rodney Stone and an order denying its motion for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19958 - 2005-12-11
to enforce a $10,000 fine against Rodney Stone and an order denying its motion for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19958 - 2005-12-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and their appeal has been consolidated with this one. Merkel and the Intervenors have filed a joint appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54225 - 2014-09-15
, and their appeal has been consolidated with this one. Merkel and the Intervenors have filed a joint appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54225 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the suppression motion in September 2019.1 Trial counsel and the State agreed to the following facts recited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718669 - 2023-10-24
on the suppression motion in September 2019.1 Trial counsel and the State agreed to the following facts recited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718669 - 2023-10-24
State v. Derrick L. Madlock
. NETTESHEIM, J. Derrick L. Madlock appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate the restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14528 - 2005-03-31
. NETTESHEIM, J. Derrick L. Madlock appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate the restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14528 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23
motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23
motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the grant of summary judgment as well as rulings on multiple motions. For the reasons that follow, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985829 - 2025-07-23
the grant of summary judgment as well as rulings on multiple motions. For the reasons that follow, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985829 - 2025-07-23
State v. Gary L. DeMars
to submit to a test for intoxication. DeMars argues that the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5977 - 2005-03-31
to submit to a test for intoxication. DeMars argues that the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5977 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. McKinney contends that the circuit court erred by denying McKinney’s motion to suppress any identification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107431 - 2014-01-26
. McKinney contends that the circuit court erred by denying McKinney’s motion to suppress any identification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107431 - 2014-01-26