Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10061 - 10070 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] State v. William J. Church
on resentencing from thirteen to seventeen years, and from the order denying his motion to reduce the increased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4612 - 2017-09-19

State v. Ronald Ransdell
order the person to be committed to the custody of the department for control, care and treatment until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2925 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph R. Przybilla
it, a reasonable person would have considered himself or herself to be in custody. In Swanson, 164 Wis.2d 446
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9172 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ronald Ransdell
order the person to be committed to the custody of the department for control, care and treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2925 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] JC-1611T Dispositional Order - Protection or Services with Termination of Parental Rights Notice (Chapter 48)
and family as follows: See attached 8. Legal custody transferred to County
/formdisplay/JC-1611T.pdf?formNumber=JC-1611T&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2026-03-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, in light of the fact T.D.M. had performed well in the structured custodial setting of ACE, why she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165628 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joseph R. Przybilla
person would have considered himself or herself to be in custody. In Swanson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9172 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
into custody for violating the no contact rule with his mother, as well as the rules prohibiting unapproved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248918 - 2019-10-22

[PDF] Rules petition 04-07 Supplemental Petition
the American Bar Association Joint Committee on Lawyer Regulation, which monitors implementation
/supreme/docs/0407petitionsup.pdf - 2010-01-20

State v. Joseph L. Egerson
motion to suppress the evidence and denying the State’s motion to reconsider suppression. The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13606 - 2005-03-31