Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10061 - 10070 of 16460 for h's.
Search results 10061 - 10070 of 16460 for h's.
Russell A. Sleight v. Vicki L. Sleight
reasonably comparable to that enjoyed during the marriage. (h) The desirability of awarding the family home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6848 - 2005-03-31
reasonably comparable to that enjoyed during the marriage. (h) The desirability of awarding the family home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6848 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(h) (2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68666 - 2011-07-27
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(h) (2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68666 - 2011-07-27
[PDF]
WI App 76
-appellants, the cause was submitted on the brief of Donald H. Carlson, Eric D. Carlson, and Andrew C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436268 - 2021-12-09
-appellants, the cause was submitted on the brief of Donald H. Carlson, Eric D. Carlson, and Andrew C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436268 - 2021-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Racine County: charles h. constantine, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74931 - 2011-12-13
of the circuit court for Racine County: charles h. constantine, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74931 - 2011-12-13
2009 WI APP 26
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Robert H. Friebert and Matthew W. O’Neill of Friebert, Finerty & St
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35219 - 2009-02-23
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Robert H. Friebert and Matthew W. O’Neill of Friebert, Finerty & St
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35219 - 2009-02-23
State v. Brandon E. Jones
of tetrahydrocannabinols (marijuana), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(h)1. (2001-02).[2] The State recommended fourteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20077 - 2006-01-09
of tetrahydrocannabinols (marijuana), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(h)1. (2001-02).[2] The State recommended fourteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20077 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
H. Yamahiro entered the order resolving the motions for summary judgment that underlie the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250211 - 2019-11-19
H. Yamahiro entered the order resolving the motions for summary judgment that underlie the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250211 - 2019-11-19
State v. Louis M. Elizondo, Jr.
County: DUANE H. POLIVKA, Judge. Affirmed. DEININGER, J.[1] Louis Elizondo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
County: DUANE H. POLIVKA, Judge. Affirmed. DEININGER, J.[1] Louis Elizondo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: charles h. constantine, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Terrell D. Cobbs appeals from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131635 - 2014-12-16
: charles h. constantine, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Terrell D. Cobbs appeals from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131635 - 2014-12-16
Alaskan Fireplace, Inc. v. Diane Everett
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Racine County: CHARLES H. CONSTANTINE, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5884 - 2005-03-31
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Racine County: CHARLES H. CONSTANTINE, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5884 - 2005-03-31