Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10061 - 10070 of 83324 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 10061 - 10070 of 83324 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
by failing to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search and that the convictions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31
by failing to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search and that the convictions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dean H. Cutsforth
of all doorway arrests. 3 Wayne R. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 6.1(e) (3d ed. 1996). A case where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3543 - 2005-03-31
of all doorway arrests. 3 Wayne R. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 6.1(e) (3d ed. 1996). A case where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3543 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dean H. Cutsforth
doorway arrests. 3 WAYNE R. LAFAVE, SEARCH & SEIZURE § 6.1(e) (3 d ed. 1996). A case where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3543 - 2017-09-19
doorway arrests. 3 WAYNE R. LAFAVE, SEARCH & SEIZURE § 6.1(e) (3 d ed. 1996). A case where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3543 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
into the residence. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050789 - 2025-12-17
into the residence. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050789 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361760 - 2021-05-05
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361760 - 2021-05-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2006AP1883-CR 2 ¶2 The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30396 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2006AP1883-CR 2 ¶2 The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30396 - 2014-09-15
State v. James Warren
. The victim in this case, D.R., was a co-worker of Warren at the Miles Kimball Company in Oshkosh. Just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11717 - 2005-03-31
. The victim in this case, D.R., was a co-worker of Warren at the Miles Kimball Company in Oshkosh. Just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11717 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
) whether the search of Matthews’ home that led to the discovery of the evidence against him violated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109194 - 2014-03-18
) whether the search of Matthews’ home that led to the discovery of the evidence against him violated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109194 - 2014-03-18
[PDF]
Douglas Thums v. Village of Rib Lake
disagree. Because § 74.11(12)(a) does not require treasurers to search all available records to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26392 - 2017-09-21
disagree. Because § 74.11(12)(a) does not require treasurers to search all available records to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26392 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. See State v. Young, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30396 - 2007-09-26
Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. See State v. Young, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30396 - 2007-09-26