Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10071 - 10080 of 12464 for mr.
Search results 10071 - 10080 of 12464 for mr.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement in Mr. Smith’s own case. This witness, like any other witness, may be prosecuted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202509 - 2017-11-15
of initial confinement in Mr. Smith’s own case. This witness, like any other witness, may be prosecuted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202509 - 2017-11-15
Carla B. v. Timothy N.
, “the record is utterly absent … of any attempts of Mr. [N] … to be a parent [or of] any meaningful response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15327 - 2005-03-31
, “the record is utterly absent … of any attempts of Mr. [N] … to be a parent [or of] any meaningful response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15327 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert D. Keith
to a mistrial if we start to get into things which Mr. Keith is not even charged with, and that’s what concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14920 - 2017-09-21
to a mistrial if we start to get into things which Mr. Keith is not even charged with, and that’s what concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14920 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Diehl
the condition of his bond did not "water ... down the overall concept or depth of the facts as to result in Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9624 - 2017-09-19
the condition of his bond did not "water ... down the overall concept or depth of the facts as to result in Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9624 - 2017-09-19
State v. Earl L. Diehl
of the facts as to result in Mr. Diehl not understanding what we were talking about." The court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9625 - 2005-03-31
of the facts as to result in Mr. Diehl not understanding what we were talking about." The court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Williams
court, in addressing the issue at sentencing, stated: “[T]he record reflects, Mr. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11241 - 2017-09-19
court, in addressing the issue at sentencing, stated: “[T]he record reflects, Mr. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11241 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
William B. Rowe, Jr. v. Gertrude A. Schnittka
: “The court makes those specific findings now. There is adequate evidence in the record that Mr. Rowe used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16328 - 2017-09-21
: “The court makes those specific findings now. There is adequate evidence in the record that Mr. Rowe used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16328 - 2017-09-21
State v. Paul L. Polak
: THE COURT: Mr. Polak, you do not wish the assistance of the public defender’s office? [POLAK]: No, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2005-03-31
: THE COURT: Mr. Polak, you do not wish the assistance of the public defender’s office? [POLAK]: No, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Garry C. Eskridge
expectation of privacy in this case is Eskridge’s testimony to this effect: [Defense Counsel]: Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4478 - 2017-09-19
expectation of privacy in this case is Eskridge’s testimony to this effect: [Defense Counsel]: Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4478 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
acknowledged the prosecutor did “point out some negative characteristics of Mr. Schabow,” but she noted he also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06
acknowledged the prosecutor did “point out some negative characteristics of Mr. Schabow,” but she noted he also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06