Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10071 - 10080 of 12464 for mr.
Search results 10071 - 10080 of 12464 for mr.
State v. Paul L. Polak
: THE COURT: Mr. Polak, you do not wish the assistance of the public defender’s office? [POLAK]: No, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2005-03-31
: THE COURT: Mr. Polak, you do not wish the assistance of the public defender’s office? [POLAK]: No, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Garry C. Eskridge
expectation of privacy in this case is Eskridge’s testimony to this effect: [Defense Counsel]: Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4478 - 2017-09-19
expectation of privacy in this case is Eskridge’s testimony to this effect: [Defense Counsel]: Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4478 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
acknowledged the prosecutor did “point out some negative characteristics of Mr. Schabow,” but she noted he also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06
acknowledged the prosecutor did “point out some negative characteristics of Mr. Schabow,” but she noted he also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144102 - 2015-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
by Mr. Latorre slapping [him] in the face with his penis.” The victim then answered “yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101361 - 2013-08-26
by Mr. Latorre slapping [him] in the face with his penis.” The victim then answered “yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101361 - 2013-08-26
Frontsheet
SCR 22.40 (Confidentiality) and asserting that "whether Mr. Murphy has or has not filed previous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123952 - 2014-10-13
SCR 22.40 (Confidentiality) and asserting that "whether Mr. Murphy has or has not filed previous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123952 - 2014-10-13
[PDF]
WI App 32
concluded: So, Mr. Gee, you deserve punishment. There’s no question about that. And you just have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27939 - 2014-09-15
concluded: So, Mr. Gee, you deserve punishment. There’s no question about that. And you just have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27939 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the charges involving D.H. as “Mr. Williams.” No-merit counsel notes that trial counsel could have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180637 - 2017-09-21
to the charges involving D.H. as “Mr. Williams.” No-merit counsel notes that trial counsel could have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180637 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James D. Kurtzweil v. Nancy M. Kurtzweil
said in Fobes, “the factual finding by the court of Mrs. Fobes’ inability to become self-supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13378 - 2017-09-21
said in Fobes, “the factual finding by the court of Mrs. Fobes’ inability to become self-supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13378 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or unreasonable, substantial or unsubstantial, by the speed that Mr. Churchill was going. Let alone the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946302 - 2025-04-23
or unreasonable, substantial or unsubstantial, by the speed that Mr. Churchill was going. Let alone the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946302 - 2025-04-23
State v. Duran Thomas
that period of time would not be sufficient to address all of the problems that have Mr. Thomas here before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2460 - 2005-03-31
that period of time would not be sufficient to address all of the problems that have Mr. Thomas here before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2460 - 2005-03-31