Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10081 - 10090 of 50086 for our.
Search results 10081 - 10090 of 50086 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841908 - 2024-08-28
conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841908 - 2024-08-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
evidence. Our review of the appellate Record satisfies us that the no-merit report sufficiently analyzes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913870 - 2025-02-12
evidence. Our review of the appellate Record satisfies us that the no-merit report sufficiently analyzes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913870 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759310 - 2024-02-08
court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759310 - 2024-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231604 - 2019-01-03
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231604 - 2019-01-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of 2011. Upon our review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119837 - 2014-09-15
of 2011. Upon our review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119837 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603646 - 2022-12-22
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603646 - 2022-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and eight years of extended supervision. ¶4 Our standard of review is well settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156311 - 2017-09-21
confinement and eight years of extended supervision. ¶4 Our standard of review is well settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156311 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph C. Clark
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14406 - 2005-03-31
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14406 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a motion for postconviction DNA testing and for appointment of counsel. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118590 - 2014-07-28
a motion for postconviction DNA testing and for appointment of counsel. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118590 - 2014-07-28
CA Blank Order
to Harrison’s sentences would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146199 - 2015-08-10
to Harrison’s sentences would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146199 - 2015-08-10