Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10081 - 10090 of 17242 for probate/1000.
Search results 10081 - 10090 of 17242 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Dorian H.
is not supported by the evidence in that the probation officer's testimony as to available juvenile court programs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9278 - 2017-09-19
is not supported by the evidence in that the probation officer's testimony as to available juvenile court programs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9278 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not a final order. In a probate proceeding, a party “may take an appeal … at any time … when a special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123397 - 2017-09-21
was not a final order. In a probate proceeding, a party “may take an appeal … at any time … when a special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123397 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
by three years of probation.1 Thompson brought two postconviction motions. His first motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15440 - 2017-09-21
by three years of probation.1 Thompson brought two postconviction motions. His first motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15440 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dorian H.
is not supported by the evidence in that the probation officer's testimony as to available juvenile court programs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9277 - 2005-03-31
is not supported by the evidence in that the probation officer's testimony as to available juvenile court programs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9277 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with for the rest of their lives.” The court noted “this isn’t a probation sentence” case as “[t]hat would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137483 - 2017-09-21
with for the rest of their lives.” The court noted “this isn’t a probation sentence” case as “[t]hat would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137483 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ probation on the false imprisonment charge, consecutive to count one; and eight years’ probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251693 - 2019-12-23
’ probation on the false imprisonment charge, consecutive to count one; and eight years’ probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251693 - 2019-12-23
[PDF]
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
by three years of probation.1 Thompson brought two postconviction motions. His first motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15441 - 2017-09-21
by three years of probation.1 Thompson brought two postconviction motions. His first motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15441 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recommendation at defendant’s original sentencing hearing, but defendant’s probation was revoked and the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234542 - 2019-02-12
recommendation at defendant’s original sentencing hearing, but defendant’s probation was revoked and the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234542 - 2019-02-12
[PDF]
State v. William Ray Toles
assistant,” rather than a probation and parole agent. The program assistant did not recall the specifics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3710 - 2017-09-19
assistant,” rather than a probation and parole agent. The program assistant did not recall the specifics
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3710 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in favor of a five-year term of probation.2 This court affirmed the judgment of conviction in a no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36431 - 2014-09-15
in favor of a five-year term of probation.2 This court affirmed the judgment of conviction in a no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36431 - 2014-09-15